Residents Against Waste Site Ltd v Lancashire County Council & Anor, Court of Appeal - Administrative Court, November 07, 2007, [2007] EWHC 2558 (Admin)
Linked as:
Linked as:
Extract
Residents Against Waste Site Ltd v Lancashire County Council & Anor, Court of Appeal - Administrative Court, November 07, 2007, [2007] EWHC 2558 (Admin)
Neutral Citation Number: [2007] EWHC 2558 (Admin)
Case No: CO/1320/2007IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICEQUEEN'S BENCH DIVISIONADMINISTRATIVE COURTRoyal Courts of JusticeStrand, London, WC2A 2LLDate: 07/11/2007Before :THE HON MR JUSTICE IRWIN- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Between :- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -(Transcript of the Handed Down Judgment ofWordWave International LimitedA Merrill Communications Company190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AGTel No: 020 7404 1400, Fax No: 020 7831 8838Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -David Wolfe (instructed by Public Interest Lawyers Birmingham) for the ClaimantsDavid Elvin QC and Charles Banner (instructed by Lancashire County Council) for the DefendantHearing dates: 20 -21 September 2007- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -JudgementMr Justice Irwin : Factual Background and Chronology1. The Defendant Lancashire County Council [LCC] is both the Waste Disposal Authority and the Waste Planning Authority for Lancashire. The Interested Party, Global Renewables Ltd [Global] is the main contractor for building work on the relevant site. The Claimant, Residents Against Waste Site Limited [RAWS] is a limited company formed to represent the interests of local objectors to the development in question. The circumstances of the formation of the company are relevant and I address them later in these reasons. RAWS seeks judicial review of the grant of planning permission for a waste technology plant on the site of the old Leyland Vehicles Test Track at Farrington Moss, Leyland in Lancashire. 2. The site in question is 14.6 hectares in area. Previous planning permission was granted for a smaller waste disposal facility on the site. This plan would not have occupied the whole site and was not proceeded with, but forms a backdrop to this application. There has thus for a long period been the prospect of such a development on this site, in one form or another. 3. On 17 July 2006, LCC as Wast...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United Kingdom
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Athletics | Holloway Inspires Flintshire to Victory | ; news in brief | Letters [Scot Region] | Fasa Corporation and Virtual World Entertainment, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Playmates To... | Triangle Cement Corp. as Bareboat Charterer and Hughes Bulk Inc. as Owner of the Barge N L Wallace Plaintiffs-Appellants... | United States Marshals Service, and the Department of Justice, Petitioners, v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, Respondent, Americ... | celcom communications corporation appellant v federal communications commission appellee cellular mobile corp. cellular telephone company...